![]() |
![]() |
Bibliography | Home |
What's new in KRIS Klamath-Trinity Version 3.0
KRIS Version 3.0 for the Klamath-Trinity captures a great deal of new data and reports compiled since the publication of Version 2.0 in April 2001. Some studies were precipitated by the crisis of the September 2002 fish kill in the lower Klamath River, while others like the Trinity River TMDL and Klamath flow studies are associated with longer term processes. Below is a selection of key documents on emerging science in the Klamath and Trinity River watersheds. See the Bibliography page for a complete list of documents in KRIS Version 3.0.New Klamath River Documents
![]() |
How Much Flow Does the Klamath River Need? Flow Study (Hardy Phase II): "This report details the analytical approach and modeling results from site-specific studies conducted within the main stem Klamath River below Iron Gate Dam downstream to the estuary. Study results are utilized to make revised interim instream flow recommendations necessary to protect the aquatic resources within the main stem Klamath River between Iron Gate and the estuary." This report has been held in draft and, consequently, not fully utilized as a basis for setting flow levels by government agencies and the courts. The Klamath Basin Water Users have sponsored a critique of Hardy Phase II. See Vogel 2003. Hardy, T. B. and R. C. Addley. 2001. DRAFT. Evaluation of interim instream flow needs in the Klamath River: Phase II. Final report [60 Mb] Vogel, D. 2003. Salmon rearing habitats in the main stem Klamath River. Natural Resource Scientists, Inc. Red Bluff, CA. 37 pp. [1.65Mb]
|
![]() |
What Caused the September 2002 Fish Kill? An estimated 33,000 adult salmon and steelhead died in the lower Klamath River in mid-September, 2002. Reports on causal mechanisms were produced by the California Department of Fish and Game, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Klamath Basin Water Users. Not all of the reports agree, but water quality and fisheries data are available in KRIS Version 3.0 for further analysis. California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG). 2003. September 2002 Klamath River Fish Kill: Preliminary analysis of contributing factors [700 Kb] Guillen, G. 2003. Klamath River fish die-off, September 2002: Report on estimate of mortality. Report number AFWO-01-03 . U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office. Arcata, CA. 35 pp. [425kb] Guillen, G. 2003. Klamath River fish die-off, September 2002: Causative factors of mortality. Report number AFWO-F-02-03 . U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office. Arcata, CA. 128 pp. [1.1Mb] Vogel, D. 2002. Assessment of Klamath River water temperatures downstream of Iron Gate Dam during September and October 2002. Natural Resource Scientists, Inc. Red Bluff, CA. 21 pp. [4.5Mb]
|
![]() |
Are There Native Coho Salmon in the Middle Klamath, Shasta and Scott? Discovery of hundreds of coho salmon in the Scott River basin during December 2001 and January 2002 surveys sparked a controversy over whether this species is native to interior portions of the Klamath River basin below Iron Gate Dam or introduced. The Scott River spawning survey provides compelling evidence, particularly since there were no fin-clipped fish, which would indicate hatchery origin. Downstream migrant reports in the Shasta and Scott also confirm natural production. Maurer, S. 2002. Scott River watershed adult coho salmon spawning survey: December 2001-January 2002 [ 3.0 Mb] Hampton, M. 2003. Shasta River fish counting facility, chinook and coho salmon observations in 2002, Siskiyou County, CA. California Department of Fish and Game. Yreka, CA. 17 pp.
|
Click to enlarge Figure 7.2. (48 kb) |
NAS
2003 Report on Klamath Endangered Fishes: The National Academy of
Sciences became involved in the Klamath Basin after a critically dry year
in 2001 caused the water supply to the Klamath Project in the Upper Klamath
Basin to be shut off. They produced a Draft report in 2002 on the basis
of flow decisions, then followed up with this more comprehensive report
on Endangered and Threatened fishes. The report includes causes for decline
as well as steps necessary for recovery.
National Academies of Science (NAS). 2003. Endangered and Threatened Fishes in the Klamath River Basin: Causes of decline and strategies for recovery. Prepared for the NAS by the National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Committee on Endangered and Threatened Fishes in the Klamath River Basin. Washington, D.C. 358 pp. [5.1Mb]
|
|
|
Karuk Ecosystem Restoration Program: The Karuk
Tribe is centered in the Middle Klamath and lower Salmon River basins
and has worked cooperatively with the U.S. Forest Service in collecting
data to characterize the habitat quality, flows, use by fish and restoration
needs by sub-basin.
Karuk Tribe of California. 2003. Karuk Ecosystem Restoration Program: Karuk Ancestral Territory, Mid-Klamath/Salmon River Sub-basin, Humboldt and Siskiyou Counties, California. Progress report, 31 March 2003. Prepared by the Karuk Tribe, Department of Natural Resources. Orleans, CA. 39 pp. [2.95Mb] |
![]()
Trinity River Basin New Documents
![]() |
Sediment Monitoring and Trinity TMDL Studies: The Clean Water Act requires clean up of water bodies that are listed as impaired. The Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) process in the mainstem and South Fork identify sediment sources, including human caused ones, which are preventable. The mainstem Trinity River has several studies pursuant to the TMDL. Graham Matthews and Associates . 2001. Sediment source analysis for the mainstem Trinity River, Trinity County, CA. Volume 1: Text, tables, figures. Prepared for Tetra Tech, Inc. Weaverville, CA. 190 pp. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Trinity River Total Maximum Daily Load for Sediment (with attached comment responsiveness summary). U.S. EPA, Region IX. San Francisco, CA. 142 pp. Trinity County Resource Conservation District (TCRCD). 2003. South Fork Trinity River Water Quality Monitoring Project - Agreement No. P0010340 Final Report. Prepared for California Department of Fish and Game by TCRCD, with assistance from Graham Matthews . Weaverville, CA. 77 pp. [10.5Mb]
|
Click to enlarge Figure 2 from McBain and Trush (2002). [20 Kb] |
Recent Restoration Related Reports: The Trinity River Restoration Program has, as one of its objectives, to restore flows necessary to allow hydraulic function to support salmon and steelhead, but bridges below Lewiston restrict the amount of flow that can be released. One report listed below deals with bridge modifications needed to allow adequate flows. Gravel recruitment below dams is cut off, and the second study below studies sources of gravel to augment substrate supply necessary for spawning. McBain and Trush. 2002. Estimation of 50- and 100-year tributary accretion floods Lewiston Dam to Treadwell Bridge, Trinity River, California. Prepared for the Trinity River Restoration Program by S. McBain . Arcata, CA. 35 pp. [1.35Mb] McBain and Trush Inc. 2003. ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT - Coarse Sediment Management Plan Lewiston Dam to Grass Valley Creek, Trinity River, CA. Prepared for U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Northern California Area Office. Arcata, CA. 101 pp. [57Mb]
|
|
U.S.
Forest Service Watershed Analyses: The Six Rivers and Shasta-Trinity
National Forests have completed watershed analyses on two major Key Watershed
areas in the Trinity Basin in recent years.
U.S.D.A. Forest Service (USFS). 2000. Horse Linto, Mill and Tish Tang Creek Watershed Analysis. Version 1. USFS, Pacific Southwest Region. Six Rivers National Forest. Eureka, CA. 380 pp. USDA Forest Service. 2003. North Fork Trinity River, East Fork North Fork Trinity River and Canyon Creek Watershed Analysis. Prepared by Shasta Trinity National Forest, Trinity River Management Unit. Redding, CA. 59 pp.
|
|
Proposed
Wilderness and Salmon Restoration Areas: The roadless areas of the Klamath Trinity Basin
provide cool water refugia for native salmon and steelhead as well as
protecting old growth habitat for many endangered and threatened animals.
These areas also provide great recreational opportunities and economic
benefits to the local communities. The
reports listed below provide pictures and information about the 10 proposed
Salmon
Restoration Areas, Wilderness Areas, and Wilderness Area Additions in the Klamath Trinity Basin.
Rose, D., 2004. Klamath Trinity Watershed: Salmon restoration and proposed Wilderness Areas. South Fork Trinity River Land Conservancy and California Wilderness Coalition. Mad River, CA. 13 pp. [1.1Mb] Baldwin, K. C. 2003. An assessment of potential effects on the timber economy of Trinity County, CA and the risks and severity of fire in Trinity National Forest from passage of the California Wild Heritage Act. Prepared for U.S. Bureau of Land Management. Redding, CA. 14 pp. [9.5Mb] For more information see the South Fork Trinity River Land Conservancy website http://wriver.mystarband.net or the California Wilderness Coalition website http://www.californiawild.org to learn about state-wide efforts. |
| www.krisweb.com |