Area/Topic  |  Bibliography   |  Background   |  Hypotheses   |  Home


 
 

KRIS Russian River: Meta Information Page

This page contains detailed information about a data set in KRIS, including where the original data reside and how to contact the sources for the data. Data sets are linked to the appropriate page by means of the Meta Identifier. Many data sets can be linked to same page by sharing the same Meta Identifier.

Meta IdentifierDryCr_geo
Type of DataHistorical channel geometry metrics for Dry Creek
OriginatorMichael D. Harvey and Stanley A. Schumm
DescriptionAnalysis of Dry Creek downstream of Warm Springs Dam in order to determine its responses to land use change, gravel mining and dam closure.
AreaDry Creek downstream of Warm Springs Dam to the confluence with the Russian River
Metadata Date7/24/2003
Metadata ContactBrian Woolsey
Contact Person PrimaryMichael Harvey or Stanley Schumm
Statusintegrating
Access Constraintsnone
Lead PersonBrian Woolsey
Lead OrganizationIFR
Data Set Namestreamchannel_drycreek_channelgeometry_summary.dbf
Maint. and Update Freq.none
PurposeEvaluate changes in Dry Creek channel geometry related to land use.
Data Quality Informationgood; however, raw data were not available
Use Constraintsnone
Supplemental InformationStudy published in: Erosion and Sedimentation in the Pacific Rim (Proceedings of the Corvallis Symposium, August, 1987). IAHS Publ. no. 165
CountiesSonoma
PublisherIAHS Publ.
Publication DateAugust 1987
Issue Identificationno. 165
TitleResponse of Dry Creek, California, to land use change, gravel mining and dam closure
AbstractA 21.5 km reach of Dry Creek, downstream of Warm Springs dam, was studied in order to determine its responses to land use change, gravel mining and dam closure. Land use changes (1850-1870) caused aggradation and then degradation, but the channel was in equilibrium by 1900. Gravel mining in Dry Creek and the Russian River (1900-1950's) reduced base level of Dry Creek by 3m. The Channel degraded by an average of 3.2m, and by 1984 mean channel width and depth, at bankfull stage, had increased from 9.8 - 101.8m and from 1.4 - 5.8m, respectively. Channel longitudinal profiles were not significantly different; therefore, the major response of Dry Creek to the imposed changes was an increase of width. Dam closure (1983) did not cause the expected further degradation of Dry Creek because of channel armoring, tributary contribution of sediment, emplacement of 3 grade-control sills, and the presence of bedrock outcrops in the channel.
Contact OrganizationEarth Resources Dept. Colorado State University
Contact CityFort Collins
Contact StateColorado
Contact Zip Code80523

 
 
 
  www.krisweb.com